PURELL® Advanced Hand Sanitizer Refreshing Gel

1 fl oz Flip Cap Bottle 36 Ct Display Bowl

PURELL® Advanced Hand Sanitizer Refreshing Gel
SKU: 3901-36-BWL
Size: 1 fl oz
SDS Downloads English Spanish

PURELL® Advanced Hand Sanitizer Refreshing Gel

1 fl oz Flip Cap Bottle 36 Ct Display Bowl

This refreshing aloe gel hand sanitizer kills germs & leaves hands feeling soft, and is proven to prevent the spread of germs that can cause illness in critical and everyday situations.

  • PURELL® is America's #1 hand sanitizer, and uses the same proven formula that's used and trusted in hospitals¹ to help families stay healthy
  • PURELL Advanced Hand Sanitizer kills more than 99.99% of most illness-causing germs without damaging skin²
  • One squirt of PURELL® Advanced Hand Sanitizer equals two squirts of other national brands³, providing 2 times the sanitizing strength⁴
  • Our scientists created patented formulas with moisturizers & skin conditioners to keep hands feeling soft, even after repeated use
  • PURELL® Advanced Hand Sanitizer is free of triclosan, parabens and preservatives
  • Convenient, portable bottle can be kept in purses, backpacks, diaper bags, gym bags and more for easy on-the-go access
SKU: 3901-36-BWL
Size: 1 fl oz
SDS Downloads English Spanish

Refreshing gel formulation.

PURELL Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer is the most trusted & used brand by hospitals.

Proven to outperform other hand sanitizers ounce for ounce.

SKU
3901-36-BWL
Size
1 fl oz
Case Pack
36
Case Weight
3.1 lbs
Overall Case Dimensions
8.56 h x 6.0 w x 8.75 d
Overall Unit Dimensions
3.36 h x 1.48 w x 0.75 l
Case Cu. Ft.
0.26 ft³
Cases Per Layer
32
Cases Per Pallet
160
Layers Per Pallet
5
Product Type Packaging
Bottles
Store Below
110°F (43°C)
Country of Manufacture
United States
UPC (Each)
073852013337
Case UPC (GTIN)
10073852013334

1. Place enough product in your palm to thoroughly cover your hands.

2. Rub hands together briskly until dry. Should take approximately 15 seconds.

Reducing Infection Rates in Healthcare

Comparative efficacy of commercially available alcohol-based hand rubs and World Health Organization-recommended hand rubs: Formulation matters


Read the article

Results: The novel ABHR formulations met efficacy requirements for both HCPHW and EN 1500 when tested at application volumes typically used in these methods. Moreover, these formulations met HCPHW requirements when tested at a more realistic 2-mL product application. In contrast, the commercial ABHRs and World Health Organization formulations failed to meet HCPHW requirements using a 2-mL application. Importantly, product performance did not correlate with alcohol concentration.
Conclusion: Product formulation can greatly influence the overall antimicrobial efficacy of ABHRs and is a more important factor than alcohol concentration alone. Two novel ABHRs based on 70% ethanol have been formulated to meet global efficacy standards when tested at volumes more representative of normal product use in health care environments.
Reference: AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control. August 2012. Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 521-525. Sarah L. Edmonds, MS, David R. Macinga, PhD, Patricia Mays-Suko, BS, Collette Duley, BS, Joseph Rutter, BS, William R. Jarvis, MD, James W. Arbogast, PhD. Published Online: January 24, 2012

Reducing Infection Rates in Healthcare

Effectiveness of a comprehensive hand hygiene program for reduction of infection rates in a long-term care facility


Read the article

Results: Infection rates for LRTIs were reduced from 0.97 to 0.53 infections per 1,000 resident-days (P = .01) following the intervention, a statistically significant decline. Infection rates for SSTIs were reduced from 0.30 to 0.25 infections per 1,000 resident-days (P = .65). A 54% compliance rate was observed among HCP.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the use of alcohol-based hand rubs, as part of a comprehensive hand hygiene program for HCP and residents, can decrease infection rates in LTCFs.
Reference: AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control. January 2013. Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 39-44. Steven J. Schweon, RN, MPH, MSN, CIC, HEM; Sarah L. Edmonds, MS, Jane Kirk, MSN, RN, CIC, Douglas Y. Rowland, PhD, Carmen Acosta, RN, BSN

Reducing Infection Rates in Healthcare

Efficacy of Novel Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Products at Typical In-Use Volumes


Read the article

Abstract: In vivo efficacies of 2 alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) products (gel and foam) were evaluated at a volume of 1.1 mL. Both met US Food and Drug Administration log10 reduction requirements after a single application and 10 consecutive applications. This is the first study to identify ABHR formulations capable of meeting efficacy requirements with a single-dispenser actuation.
Reference: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Vol. 34, No. 3 (March 2013), pp. 299-301. David R. Macinga, PhD, Sarah L. Edmonds, MS, Esther Campbell, BS, David J. Shumaker, BS, James W. Arbogast, PhD

Reducing Infection Rates in Healthcare

The relative influences of product volume, delivery format and alcohol concentration on dry-time and efficacy of alcohol-based hand rubs


Read the article

Results: Volumes of six ABHR determined to rub dry in 30 s ranged from 1.7 mL to 2.1 mL, and the rate of drying varied significantly between products. ABHR dry-times increased linearly with application volume and decreased linearly with increasing alcohol concentration, but were not significantly influenced by product format. An ABHR foam (70% EtOH), rinse (80% EtOH), and gel (90% EtOH) each met EN 1500 efficacy requirements when tested at a volume of 3 mL, but failed when tested at volumes that dried in 30 s.HCP.
Conclusion: Application volume is the primary driver of ABHR dry-time and efficacy, whereas delivery format does not significantly influence either. Although products with greater alcohol concentration dry more quickly, volumes required to meet EN 1500 can take longer than 30 s to dry, even when alcohol concentration is as high as 90%. Future studies are needed to better understand application volumes actually used by healthcare workers in practice, and to understand the clinical efficacy of ABHR at such volumes.
Reference: BMC Infectious Diseases 2014, 14:511 David R Macinga, David J Shumaker, Heinz-Peter Werner, Sarah L Edmonds, Rachel A Leslie, Albert E Parker and James W Arbogast

Reducing Infection Rates in Healthcare

A close look at alcohol gel as an antimicrobial sanitizing agent.


Read the article

Results: The Healthcare Personnel Handwash data showed that the mean log reductions from baseline were greatest for the lotion soaps with alcohol gel sanitizer, less for the alcohol alone and the antimicrobial soap alone, and least for the bland soap alone. All of the product regimens showed a low potential for skin irritation.
Conclusion: In terms of both microorganism reduction and skin irritation, the most effective product regimens were the use of alcohol gel sanitizer in combination with either an antimicrobial or a bland soap.
Reference: AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control. 27(4):332-338, August 1999. Paulson, Daryl S. PhD a; Fendler, Eleanor J. PhD b; Dolan, Michael J. BS b; Williams, Ronald A. MS b

Reducing Infection Rates in Healthcare

The impact of alcohol hand sanitizer use on infection rates in an extended care facility.


Read the article

Results: The primary infection types found were urinary tract with Foley catheter, respiratory tract, and wound infections. Comparison of the infection types and rates for the units where hand sanitizer was used with those for the control units where the hand sanitizer was not used showed a 30.4% decrease in infection rates for the 34-month period in the units where hand sanitizer was used.
Conclusion: This study indicates that use of an alcohol gel hand sanitizer can decrease infection rates and provide an additional tool for an effective infection control program.
Reference: AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control. 30(4):226-233, June 2002. Fendler, E. J. PhD a; Ali, Y. PhD a; Hammond, B. S. a; Lyons, M. K. BSN, RN b; Kelley, M. B. CRRN b; Vowell, N. A. RN b

Reducing Infection Rates in Healthcare

Use of alcohol hand sanitizer as an infection control strategy in an acute care facility.


Read the article

Results: The primary infection types (more than 80%) found were urinary tract (UTI) and surgical site (SSI) infections. Infection types and rates for the unit during the period the alcohol hand sanitizer (intervention) was used were compared with the infection types and rates for the same unit when the alcohol hand sanitizer was not used (baseline); the results demonstrated a 36.1% decrease in infection rates for the 10-month period that the alcohol hand sanitizer was used.
Conclusion: This study indicates that use of an alcohol gel hand sanitizer can decrease infection rates and provide an additional tool for an effective infection control program in acute care facilities. (Am J Infect Control 2003;31:109-16.)
Reference: AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control. 31(2):109-116, April 2003. Hilburn, Jessica MT (ASCP), CIC a; Hammond, Brian S. b; Fendler, Eleanor J. PhD b; Groziak, Patricia A. MS b

Reducing Infection Rates in Healthcare

Bacterial shedding and desquamation from the hands of healthcare workers correlates with skin condition.


Read the article

Results: Bacterial dispersal and quantitative skin measurements were obtained from 86 healthcare workers over a 3 day period. The levels of bacteria shed from the hands of the healthcare workers was found to be negatively correlated to corneometer measurements (p < 0.01); and positively correlated to desquamation index (p < 0.02). No correlation was found between levels of shed bacteria and transepidermal water loss. As expected, corneometer measurements were found to be negatively correlated to desquamation index (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: The results of this hospital study demonstrate that the levels of bacteria shed from the hands of healthcare workers are influenced by the health of the individual's skin; i.e. dry skin sheds more bacteria. This increased bacterial dispersal from dry skin may increase the infection transfer risk for healthcare workers with poor skin condition in the acute care setting.
Reference: American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 34, Issue 5, June 2006, Pages E85-E86. C.A. Kolly, J.W. Arbogast, D.R. Macinga

Reducing Absenteeism in Schools and Colleges

Effect of hand sanitizer use on elementary school absenteeism.


Read the article

Results: The overall reduction in absenteeism due to infection in the schools included in this study was 19.8% for schools that used an alcohol gel hand sanitizer compared with the control schools.
Conclusion: Elementary school absenteeism due to infection is significantly reduced when an alcohol gel hand sanitizer is used in the classroom as part of a hand hygiene program.
Reference: AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control. 28(5):340-346, October 2000. Hammond, Brian a; Ali, Yusuf PhD a; Fendler, Eleanor PhD a; Dolan, Michael a; Donovan, Sandra RN, MSN b

1. 52 Week IRI Data ending April 2018; 2017 HPIS Data; Hall & Partners, September 2017 Brand Survey.
2. BioScience Laboratories, Inc., Bozeman, MT, USA; 091106-201 & 170116-201, 19 October 2010 & 24 March 2029.
3. BioScience Laboratories, Healthcare Personnel Handwash, Study # 110103-101, 5 April 2011, Bozeman, MT BioScience Laboratories, Healthcare Personnel Handwash Study # 100907-101, 6 January 2011, Bozeman, MT.
4. Based on comparative study using 1.75 mL of PURELL® Advanced Hand Sanitizer versus 3.5 mL of other national brands with 63% or less ethyl alcohol, and tested in accordance with FDA Healthcare Personnel Handwash guidelines. National brands based on 52-week IRI scan data. Visit PURELL.com for more information.